United we stand, divided we fall.
A co-authorship analysis of management scholars in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7433/s121.2023.04Keywords:
bibliometrics, co-authorship analysis, ego-networks, management scholars, ItalyAbstract
Framing of the research. Collaborations and co-authorships are more and more typical in scientific research. Scientific collaboration has several advantages with regard to productivity, but it also has drawbacks.
Purpose of the paper. In this paper, we analysed the Italian community of management scholars with the aim of investigating their areas of interest, main research themes and publishing journals. Secondly, we carried out a co-authorship analysis to investigate the evolution of their publishing behaviours and co-authorship dynamics.
Methodology. A Scopus search was performed on the 649 Italian management scholars identified for 2019 to collect their Scopus IDs, with each ID uniquely identifying a scholar. A total of 550 Scopus IDs were collected, representing 84.7% of the 649 scholars. We then downloaded all 5,294 publications from these scholars listed in Scopus for the period 2000-2019.
A social network analysis was then applied to co-authorship publication data to analyse co-authorship dynamics and publication behaviour in four windows. Various co-authorship behaviours were analysed via ego-networks.
Results. Italian management scholars increased their production in either quantity or quality from various perspectives during the period 2000-2019. However, co-authorship dynamics increased greatly during this period, underlining new publishing behaviours (at different job levels).
Research limitations. The analysis is limited to contributions found in the Scopus database and does not include books and Italian articles.
Managerial implications. The practice of co-authorship among management scholars may foster improvements in the quality and quantity of scientific research. However, co-authorship also has drawbacks and can lead to bias in research evaluations.
Originality of the paper. The study represents the first long-term analysis of publication production on the part of Italian management scholars and also includes a co-authorship analysis.
References
ABRAMO G., D’ANGELO C., CAPRASECCA A. (2009), “Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system”, Scientometrics, vol. 79, n. 3, pp. 517-539.
ACEDO F.J., BARROSO C., CASANUEVA C., GALÁN J.L. (2006), “Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 43, n. 5, pp. 957-983.
ALBERT R., BARABÁSI A. (2002), “Statistical mechanics of complex networks”, Review of Modern Physics, vol. 74, n. 1, pp. 47-97.
ALLESINA, S. (2011), “Measuring nepotism through shared last names: the case of Italian academia”, PLoS one, vol. 6, n. 8, pp. 1-6.
BAGUES M., SYLOS-LABINI M., ZINOVYEVA N. (2019), “A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations”, Research Policy, vol. 48, n. 2, pp. 462-477.
BARABÁSI A.L., JEONG H., NEDA Z., RAVASZ E., SCHUBERT A., VICSEK T. (2002), “Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations”, Physica A, vol. 311, n. 3-4, pp. 590-614.
BEATTIE, V., & GOODACRE, A. (2004), “Publishing patterns within the UK accounting and finance academic community”, The British Accounting Review, 36(1), 7-44.
CAINELLI G., DE FELICE A., LAMONARCA M., ZOBOLI R. (2006), “The publications of Italian economists in ECONLIT. Quantitative assessment and implications for research evaluation”, Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, vol. 23, n. 3, pp. 385-423.
CAINELLI G., MAGGIONI M.A., UBERTI T.E., DE FELICE A. (2012), “Co-authorship and productivity among Italian economists”, Applied Economic Letters, vol. 19, n. 16, pp. 1609-1613.
CAINELLI G., MAGGIONI M.A., UBERTI T.E., DE FELICE A. (2015), “The strength of strong ties: How co-authorship affect productivity of academic economists?”, Scientometrics, vol. 102, n. 1, pp. 673-699.
CAPONE F. (2016), “A bibliometric analysis on tourist destinations research: Focus on destination management and tourist cluster”, In: Capone F., Tourist Clusters, Destinations and Competitiveness, pp. 15-39, Abingdon: Routledge,
CAPONE F., ZAMPI V., INNOCENTI N. (2018), “How do R&D project networks support the adoption of open innovation practice?”, Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, vol. 36, n 106, pp. 23-40.
CASANUEVA C., LARRINAGA C. (2013), “The (uncertain) invisible college of Spanish accounting scholars”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 24, n. 1, pp. 19-31.
CHEUNG W.W. (2008), “The economics of post-doc publishing”, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, vol. 8, n. 1, pp. 41-44.
COLE J.R. (2000), “A Short History of the Use of Citations as A Measure of the Impact of Scientific and Scholarly Work”, In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins, (281-300), Medford, NJ: Information Today.
CRANE D. (1969), “Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the” Invisible College” Hypothesis”, American Sociological Review, vol. 34, n. 3, pp. 335-352.
DE SOLLA-PRICE D.J. (1965), “Networks of scientific papers”, Science, vol. 149, n. 3683, pp. 510-515.
DE STEFANO D., FUCCELLA V., VITALE M.P., ZACCARIN S. (2013), “The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance”, Social Networks, vol. 35, n. 3, pp. 370-381.
DE STEFANO D., GIORDANO G., VITALE M.P. (2011), “Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks”, Quality & Quantity, vol. 45, n. 5, pp. 1091-1107.
DE STEFANO D., VITALE M.P., ZACCARIN S. (2017), “Community Structure in Co-authorship Networks: The Case of Italian Statisticians”, In Scientific Meeting of the Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (pp. 65-72), Springer, Cham.
FUCCELLA V., DE STEFANO D., VITALE M.P., ZACCARIN S. (2016), “Improving co-authorship network structures by combining multiple data sources: evidence from Italian academic statisticians”, Scientometrics, vol. 107, n. 1, pp. 167-184.
FREEMAN L.C. (1982), “Centered graphs and the structure of ego networks”, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 3, n. 3, pp. 291-304.
GLÄNZEL, W. (2002), “Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies”, Library Trends, vol. 50, no. 3, 461-473.
GARFIELD E. 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
HILMER C.E., HILMER M.J. (2005), “How do journal quality, co-authorship, and author order affect agricultural economists’ salaries?”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 87, n. 2, pp. 509-523.
HUDSON, J. (1996), “Trends in multi-authored papers in economics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 10, n. 1, pp. 153–158.
HU C. and RACHERLA P. (2008), “Visual representation of knowledge networks: a social network analysis of hospitality research domain”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 27, n. 2, pp. 302-312.
KIESSLICH T., BEYREIS M., ZIMMERMANN G., TRAWEGER A. (2021), “Citation inequality and the Journal Impact Factor: median, mean,(does it) matter?”, Scientometrics, vol. 126, n. 2, pp. 1249-1269.
KUMAR, S. (2015). “Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature”, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 67, n. 1, 55-73.
LABAND D., TOLLISON R. (2006), “Alphabetized co-authorship”, Applied Economics, vol. 38, n. 14, pp. 1649-1653.
LAZZERETTI L. (2001), “Metodologie statistiche e management research: una content analysis comparativa su alcune riviste manageriali”, Sinergie, vol. 19, n. 55, pp. 235-276.
LAZZERETTI L., CAPONE F., INNOCENTI N. (2017), “Exploring the intellectual structure of creative economy research and local economic development: a co-citation analysis”, European Planning Studies, vol. 25, n. 10, pp. 1693-1713.
LAZZERETTI L., CAPONE F., CALOFFI A., SEDITA S.R. (2021), Rethinking Clusters. Towards a New Research Agenda for Cluster Research. Cheltenham: Routledge
LAZZERETTI L., SEDITA S., CALOFFI A. (2014), “Founders and disseminators of cluster research”, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 14, n. 1, pp. 21-43.
LEE S., BOZEMAN B. (2005), “The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity”, Social studies of Science, vol. 35, n. 5, pp. 673-702.
LEVECQUE K., ANSEEL F., DE BEUCKELAER A., VAN DER HEYDEN J., GISLE L. (2017), “Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students”, Research Policy, vol. 46, n. 4, pp. 868-879.
LEYDESDORFF L., DE MOYA‐ANEGÓN F., GUERRERO‐BOTE V.P. (2010), “Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, n. 2, pp. 352-369.
MEDOFF M.H. (2003), “Collaboration and the quality of economics research”, Labour Economics, vol. 10, n. 5, pp. 597-608.
MENARDI G., DE STEFANO D. (2021), “Density-based clustering of social networks”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2101.08334.
MERIGÓ J.M., ROCAFORT A., AZNAR-ALARCÓN J.P. (2016), “Bibliometric overview of business & economics research”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 17, n. 3, pp. 397-413.
MILGRAM S. (1967), “The small world problem”, Psychology Today, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 61-67.
NEWMAN M.E.J. (2001a), “Scientific collaboration networks. I. network construction and fundamental results”, Physical Review E, vol. 64, n. 1, pp. 1-8.
NEWMAN M.E.J. (2001b), “Scientific collaboration networks. II. shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality”, Physical Review E, vol. 64, n. 1, pp. 1-7.
NEWMAN M.E.J. (2004b), “Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific co-authorship networks”, Complex Networks, vol. 101, n. 1, pp. 337-370.
NIKZAD M., JAMALI H.R., HARIRI N. (2011), “Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: a comparative study”, Library & Information Science Research, vol. 33, n. 4, pp. 313-319.
PASTORE A. (2021), “Faust, the burst forth the career and publication ethics”. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, vol. 39, n. 2, pp. 11-14.
PLÜMPER T., RADAELLI C., (2004), “Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990-2002”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 11, n. 6, pp. 1112-1127.
PODSAKOFF P.M., MACKENZIE S.B., PODSAKOFF N.P., BACHRACH D.G. (2008), “Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century”, Journal of Management, vol. 34, n. 4, pp. 641-720.
RACHERLA P., HU C. (2010), “A social network perspective of tourism research collaborations”, Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 37, n. 4, pp. 1012-1034.
REIJERS, H. A., SONG, M., ROMERO, H., DAYAL, U., Eder, J., & Koehler, J. (2009, September). A collaboration and productiveness analysis of the BPM community. In International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 1-14). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
SEDITA S.R., CALOFFI A., LAZZERETTI L. (2020), “The invisible college of cluster research: a bibliometric core-periphery analysis of the literature”, Industry and Innovation, vol. 27, n. 1, pp. 562-584.
VAN DALEN H.P. (2020), “How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science: The Case of Academic Economists”, (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2020-020), CentER, Center for Economic Research.
VAN DALEN H.P., HENKENS K. (2012), “Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 63, n. 7, pp. 1282-1293.
VAN Der LEIJ, M.J., GOYAL, S. (2011). “Strong Ties in a Small World”, Review of Network Economics, vol. 10, n, 2, pp. 1-20.
WASSERMAN S., FAUST K. (1994), Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
WATTS D.J., STROGATZ S.H. (1998), “Collective dynamics of ‘small-world ‘networks”, Nature, vol. 393, n. 6684, pp. 440-442.
WIECZOREK A.L., MITRĘGA M. (2017), Academic teachers under stress in the publish or perish era. CeDeWu.
YAN E., DING Y. (2009), “Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A co-authorship network analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, n. 10, pp. 2107-2118.
YE Q., LI T., LAW R. (2013), “A co-authorship network analysis of tourism and hospitality research collaboration”, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, vol. 37, n. 1, pp. 51-76.
