Digital nomadism and tourism development: Stakeholders’ perceptions of an inner area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7433/s124.2024.05Keywords:
digital nomads, sustainable tourism, minor tourism destinations, repositioning, stakeholder theoryAbstract
Framing of the research. Starting from the definition of digital nomadism and its consequences for the destinations, the study debates on sustainable tourism development opportunities for minor destinations.
Purpose of the paper. Identification of enabling factors that contribute to the establishment of a destination for digital nomads and analysis of the stakeholders’ perceptions about the impact of digital nomadism for the local development.
Methodology. The research adopts the case study method. An explorative study was conducted through eight interviews with key stakeholders, analyzed with a thematic analysis.
Results. If the coworking and Internet infrastructure are enough developed, the target of digital nomads is interesting for minor destinations that align with the principles of sustainability. Tourism products focuses on this new segment are still no defined.
Research limitations. Our study is limited to one case study. Nonetheless, Valsugana (in the Autonomous Province of Trento, Italy) is representative of minor tourism destinations that are facing stagnation and high seasonality, and considers sustainability as the starting point from which to re-define destination management strategies.
Managerial implications. The research shows the roles of key stakeholders and gathers views and expectations about this new phenomenon identifying structural, cultural and socio-economic factors, as well as opportunities and challenges for relaunching minor destinations.
Originality of the paper. The research adopts a supply-side approach and analyzes the potential of digital nomadism for the development of minor destinations. The segment of digital nomads as a means to revitalize these destinations require stakeholders to offer services and products different from the traditional ones. The case could represent a training ground to study the changes in the development of the destination by considering its life cycle.
References
ALMEIDA J., BELEZAS F. (2022), “The Rise of Half-Tourists and their Impact on the Tourism Strategies of Peripheral Territories”, In: Leitão J., Ratten V., Braga V. (Eds.): Tourism Entrepreneurship in Portugal and Spain (pp. 181-191), Springer, Cham.
AROLES J., GRANTER E., DE VAUJANY F.X. (2020), “Becoming mainstream: the professionalisation and corporatisation of digital nomadism”, New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 35, n. 1, pp. 114-129.
ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA NOMADI DIGITALI (2022), Secondo Rapporto sul Nomadismo Digitale in Italia. Retrieved from https://www.nomadidigitali.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Secondo-Rapporto-sul-Nomadismo-Digitale-in-Italia_1.4.pdf on 12.01.2023
BICHLER B.F. (2021), “Designing tourism governance: The role of local residents”, Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, vol. 19, 100389.
BYRD E.T. (2007), “Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development”, Tourism Review, vol. 62, n. 2, pp. 6-13.
BUTLER R.W. (1980), “The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources”, Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, vol. 24, p. 1, pp. 5-12.
CHEVTAEVA E., DENIZCI-GUILLET B. (2021), “Digital nomads’ lifestyles and coworkation”, Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, vol. 21, 100633.
CHOI H. C., SIRAKAYA E. (2006), “Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism”, Tourism Management, vol. 27, n. 6, pp. 1274-1289.
FLORICIC T., PAVIA N. (2021), “Linkage of leisure with remote work and digital nomadism in tourism accommodation facilities”, ToSEE -Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe, vol. 6, pp. 247-268.
FREEMAN R.E., HARRISON J.S., WICKS, A.C., PARMAR B.L., DE COLLE S. (2010), Stakeholder theory: The state of the art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
GARCEZ A., CORREIA R., CARVALHO A. (2022), “Digital Nomadism an Opportunity for Low-Density Territories: Trás-os-Montes Lands Case”. In: Abreu A., Liberato D., Ojeda J.C.G. (Eds): Advances in Tourism, Technology and Systems (pp. 91-102), Springer, Singapore.
GILLHAM B. (2005), Research Interviewing: The range of techniques: A practical guide. McGraw-Hill Education, UK.
HANNONEN O. (2020), “In search of a digital nomad: defining the phenomenon”, Information Technology and Tourism, vol. 22, n. 3, pp. 335-353.
HERMANN I., PARIS C.M. (2020), “Digital Nomadism: the nexus of remote working and travel mobility”, Information Technology and Tourism, vol. 22, n. 3, pp. 329-334.
IVONA A., RINELLA A., RINELLA F., EPIFANI F., NOCCO S. (2021), “Resilient rural areas and tourism development paths: A comparison of case studies”, Sustainability, vol. 13, n. 6, 3022.
JENNINGS G.R. (2005), “9 Interviewing: Techniques”, In Ritchie B.W., Burns P., Palmer C. (Eds.), Tourism Research Methods. Integrating Theories with Practice, CIBA Publishing, Wallingford (UK).
LEE T.H. (2013), “Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development”, Tourism Management, vol. 34, pp. 37-46.
MAKIMOTO T, MANNERS D. (1997), Digital nomad, Wiley, Chichester.
MANCINELLI F. (2020), “Digital nomads: freedom, responsibility and the neoliberal order”, Information Technology and Tourism, vol. 22, n. 3, pp. 417-437.
MARTINI U., BUFFA F. (2015), “Local networks, stakeholder dynamics and sustainability in tourism. Opportunities and limits in the light of stakeholder theory and SNA”, Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, vol. 33, n. 96, pp. 113-130.
MARTINI U., BUFFA F., ANDREANI G., ZOPPELLETTO A. (2021), “Rivoluzione digitale, nuove professioni e distant workers: vincoli e opportunità per lo sviluppo turistico sostenibile dei borghi”, Electronic Conference Proceedings of Sinergie - Sima Management Conference, Leveraging intersections in management theory and practice, University of Palermo, Italy, 10-11 June 2021.
MAYRING P. (2014), Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution, Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR), Klagenfurt.
MERKEL J. (2022), “Coworking spaces as destinations and new stakeholders in hospitality ecosystems”, In Olbrich N., Philipp J., Thees H., Pechlaner H. (Eds.), Towards an ecosystem of hospitality - location: city: destination, Graffeg Limited, London, pp. 140-147.
OKAZAKI E. (2008), “A community-based tourism model: Its conception and use”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 16, n. 5, pp. 511-529.
REICHENBERGER I. (2018), “Digital nomads-a quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure”, Annals of Leisure Research, vol. 21, n. 3, pp. 364-380.
RICHARDS G., MUNSTERS W. (2010), Cultural tourism research methods, CABI, Wallingford.
VOLL K., GAUGER F., PFNÜR A. (2022), “Work from anywhere: Traditional workation, coworkation and workation retreats: A conceptual review”, World Leisure Journal, vol. n.0 pp. 1-25.
WANG B., SCHLAGWEIN D., CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D., CAHALANE M.C. (2018), “Digital work and high-tech wanderers: Three theoretical framings and a research agenda for digital nomadism”, ACIS 2018 Proceedings, 55.
WERTHER S., BIEMANN J., BÄHR U., HENTSCHEL P., HÖLZEL M., DE VRIES W.T., FREITAG A., LIETZAU J., SCHMIED A. (2021), “Coworking im ländlichen Raum”, In Coworking als Revolution der Arbeitswelt: von Corporate Coworking bis zu Workation (pp. 95-149), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Websites
Osservatorio Innovazione digitale nel Turismo (2022), School of Management del Politecnico di Milano. Retrieved on January, 31st, 2023, from https://www.osservatori.net/it/ricerche/comunicati-stampa//turismo-italia-crescita-online
GSTC. Retrieved on February, 1st, 2023 from https://www.gstcouncil.org
