Towards a perfect learning process - where is Sweden?

  • Raine Isaksson
  • Yuji Yamamoto
  • Rickard Garvare
Keywords: education, learning, process, stakeholders, sustainability


Purpose of the paper: Competition gets tougher with globalization. Information and knowledge are shared like never before, putting pressure on businesses and nations to provide effective and efficient means of learning. Learning could be seen as the educational process from the user perspective. How could a perfect learning process look when based on process theory and how does reality compare with this? One option is defining a perfect process as doing the right thing based on stakeholder needs, doing it in the right way by minimising resource use and by being adaptable.

Methodology: Applying the proposed educational process on Swedish HEI educational processes indicates that the model can be used.

Findings: The results from the study indicate that Sweden seems to perform well in many areas but also that there are important areas of improvement, such as lifelong learning and the integration of sustainability into education.

Research limitations: The proposed process has only been partly tested.

Research and managerial implications: The strength of the process approach.

Originality/value of paper: Basic process theory in a new context.


ANTONY J., KRISHAN N., CULLEN D., KUMAR M. (2012), “Reflective practice - lean six sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs) challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 61, n. 8, pp. 940-948.

BERGMAN B., KLEFSJÖ B. (2010), Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction, Third Edition. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

EGNELL P.O. (1996), Processledning: En arbetsmodell samt erfarenheter från svenska organisationer (in Swedish), Arctic Software, Luleå Sweden.

GARVIN D.A. (1984), “What Does “Product Quality” Really Mean?”, Sloan Management Review, vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 25-43.

HAMMER M. (1996), Beyond Reengineering, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.

HARRINGTON J.H. (1991), Business Process Improvement - The Breakthrough Strategy for Total Quality Productivity and Competitiveness, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

HELLSTEN U., KLEFSJÖ B. (2000), “TQM as a Management System Consisting of Values, Techniques and Tools”, The TQM Magazine, vol. 12, n. 4, pp. 238-244.

ISAKSSON R. (2006), “Total Quality Management for Sustainable Development - process based system models”, Business Process Management Journal, vol. 12, n. 5, pp. 632-645.

ISAKSSON R., JOHNSON M. (2013), “A preliminary model for assessing university sustainability from the student perspective”, Sustainability, vol. 5, n. 9 pp. 3690-3701.

ISAKSSON R., GARVARE R., JOHNSON M., KUTTAINEN C., PAREIS J. (2015a), “Sustaining Sweden’s competitive position: lean lifelong learning”, Measuring Business Excellence, vol. 19, n. 1, pp. 92-102.

ISAKSSON R., GARVARE R., JOHNSON M. (2015b), “The crippled bottom line - measuring and managing sustainability”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 64, n. 3, pp. 334-355.

ISAKSSON R., KUTTAINEN C., GARVARE R. (2013), “Lean Higher Education and Lean Research”, Proceedings of the International Conference - Quality and Service Sciences, 16th Toulon-Verona Conference, August 29-30, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

LIKER J.K. (2004), The Toyota Way - 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

MAZZOCATO P., SAVAGE C., BROMMELS M., ARONSSON H., THOR J. (2010), “Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 19, n. 5, pp. 376-382.

MELAN E.H. (1992), Process Management. Methods for Improving Products and Service, McGraw Hill, New York.

Electronic sources

Studera (2015), Swedish Council for Higher Education, available at:, accessed July 8, 2015.

UKA (2015), Universitetskanslersämbetet (basic statistics), availavle at :, accessed July 7, 2015.

UL (2006), Updates of University law 1992:1434, available at:, accessed on 19 July 2013.

URANK (2014), Swedish University Ranking, available at:, accessed July 8, 2015.

WBCSD (2010), Vision 2050: The new agenda for business, available at:, accessed July 9, 2015.

Wikipedia (2015), Cost of Poor Quality, available at:, accessed on July 10, 2015.