Open within a box: an analysis of open innovation patterns within Canadian aerospace companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7433/s101.2016.02Keywords:
open innovation, aerospace industry, Canada, innovation managementAbstract
Purpose of the paper: This paper investigates whether and how aerospace firms in Quebec (Canada) engage open innovation within R&D strategies.
Originality of the paper: Despite the increasing interest of open innovation among scholars and practitioners, very few studies tackle the topic within traditional high-tech industry sectors, such as aerospace.
Methodology: This paper critically analyzes data from a survey carried out through in-company questionnaire-structured interviews with R&D senior management of 31 companies in the Quebec aerospace cluster. The survey addresses a wide range of innovative and collaborative practices often associated with open innovation, including managerial, cultural and strategic aspects of the concept.
Findings: The research indicates on an exploratory basis that innovation in the sector is product-oriented, with low adoption of formal intellectual-property (IP) protection mechanisms (e.g., patents) compared to strategic ones (e.g., secrecy and complexity of design). We found significant evidence of collaboration in the sample, ranging from external sourcing to co-development with strong support from local government, universities and research institutes. However, these open approaches are mostly confined within the boundaries of the aerospace industry and, therefore, not part of diversification and expansion strategies, but a natural consequence of complementarities required to develop complex aerospace products.
Practical implications: The paper promotes a discussion of the possible consequences of engaging in such limited open-innovation strategies in a world of rapid technological changes with significant risk of substitute technologies replacing entire niche markets. Also at risk are business opportunities that these knowledge-intensive companies lose when they do not disseminate internal technologies into different markets.
Research limits: All analyses in this paper are exploratory. This is mainly due to the number of samples, which is small in absolute terms, although representative in terms of the universe of analysis. This factor also limited our statistical analyses to non-parametric methods.
References
ANDERSON M. (1995), “The role of collaborative integration in industrial organization: observations from the Canadian aerospace industry”, Economic Geography, vol. 71 n. 1, pp. 55-78.
ARMELLINI F., KAMINSKI P.C., BEAUDRY C. (2011), “Consortium for research and innovation in aerospace in Quebec, Canada - a reference model for the Brazilian aerospace industry”, Product (IGDP), vol. 9, n. 2, pp. 101-109.
ARMELLINI F., KAMINSKI P.C., BEAUDRY C. (2014), “The open innovation journey in emerging economies: an analysis of the Brazilian aerospace industry”, Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, vol. 6, n. 4, pp. 462-474.
BENKLER Y. (2005), “Common wisdom: peer production of educational materials”, 17th Annual Instructional Technology Institute at Utah State University.
BIBBEE A. (2012), “Unleashing business innovation in Canada”, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 997, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
BIRKAN M. (2008), “Beamed energy propulsion: research status and needs”, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Beamed Energy Propulsion, pp. 17-25.
BOLONKIN A. (2003), “Non-rocket transportation system for space travel”, Journal of British Interplanetary Society, vol. 56, n. 7-8, pp. 231-249.
CHESBROUGH H.W. (2003), Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston/MA, USA.
CHESBROUGH H.W., APPLEYARD M.M. (2007), “Open innovation and strategy”, California Management Review, vol. 50, n. 1, pp. 57-76.
CHESBROUGH H.W., BRUNSWICKER S. (2013), "Managing open innovation in large firms, Report from executive survey on open innovation", Fraunhofer IAO, 44p. Available online: http://openinnovation.gv.at/ Access: 2015-10-22).
CHESBROUGH H.W., CROWTHER A.K. (2006), “Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries”, R&D Management, vol. 36, n. 3, pp. 229-236.
CHESBROUGH H.W., GHAFELE R. (2014), “Open innovation and intellectual property: a two-sided market perspective”, in Chesbrough H.W., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
CHESBROUGH H.W., WINTER C. (2014), “Managing inside-out open innovation: the case of complex ventures”, in Chesbrough H.W., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
DAHLANDER L., GANN D.M. (2010), “How open is innovation?”, Research Policy, vol. 39, n. 6, pp. 699-709.
DELOITTE (2016), Global aerospace and defense sector outlook: poised for a rebound, Report, 26p. Available online: http://www.deloitte.com/ Access: 2016-05-24.
EMERSON, D. (2012), “Aerospace review – Vol. 1: Beyond the horizon: Canada’s interests and future in aerospace”, Industry report mandated by the Government of Canada, Available online: http://aerospacereview.ca/, Access: 2012-12-10.
ENKEL E., GASSMANN O., CHESBROUGH H.W. (2009), “Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon”, R&D Management, vol. 39, n. 4, pp. 311-316.
ETZKOWITZ H. (2008), The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action, Routledge, New York, p. 164.
FABRIZIO K.R. (2006), “The use of university research in firm innovation”, in Chesbrough H.W., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (eds.), Open innovation: researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press, Ch.7, pp. 134-60.
FABRIZIO K.R. (2009), “Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation”, Research Policy, vol. 38, n. 2, pp. 255-67.
FOSFURI A. (2006), “The licence dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licence”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, n. 12, pp. 1141-1158.
FREEMAN C. (1991), “Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues”, Research Policy, vol. 20, n. 5, pp. 499-514.
GRIMPE C., KAISER U. (2010), “Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: the gains and pains from R&D outsourcing”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 47, n. 8, pp. 1483-1509.
HAGEDOORN J., DUYSTERS G. (2002), “External sources of innovative capabilities: the preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 39, n. 2, pp. 167-188.
HENKEL J., SCHÖBERL S., ALEXY O. (2014), “The emergence of openness: how and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation”, Research Policy, vol. 43, n. 5, pp. 879-890.
HOWE J. (2006), “The rise of crowdsourcing”, Wired, vol. 14, n. 6, June 2006.
HUIZINGH E.K.R.E (2011), “Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives”, Technovation, vol. 31, n. 1, pp. 2-9.
INDUSTRY CANADA (2011), “Innovation Canada: a call to action”, Industry Canada, Review of the Federal support to research and development - expert panel report.
ITURRIAGA F.L., CRUZ N.M. (2008), “Antecedents of corporate spin-offs in Spain: A resource-based approach”, Research Policy, vol. 37, n. 6-7, pp. 1047-56.
KITMACHER G.H. (2010), “Reference guide to the International Space Station: Assembly complete edition”, CreateSpace Independent Publishing, Charleston/SC, USA.
LICHTENTHALER U. (2010), “Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: finding the right ‘job’ for your technology”, Technovation, vol. 30, n. 7-8, pp. 429-435.
MANKIN E. (2004), “Is your product development process helping (or hindering),innovation?”, Strategy & Innovation, Harvard Business School, November-December, Article Reprint No. S0411C, pp. 1-5.
NIETO M.J., SANTAMARÍA L. (2010), “Colaboración tecnológica e innovación en las empresas de base tecnológica: implicaciones de las relaciones con universidades y otros socios tecnológicos”, Revista Galega de Economía, n. 19 (special issue), pp. 1-15.
OECD (2005), Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edition, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2008), Open innovation in global networks, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2010), Science, technology and industry outlook, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2014), The space economy at a glance, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
PENDRILL J., FERNANDEZ S. (2014), “Global aerospace report 2014”, Report, Clearwater International, Available online: http://clearwaterinternational.com/, Access: 2015-03-20.
POLE K., WINDSOR R., BOAG P., LALONDE G.L., GARDNER N. (2006), “Aerospace industry”, The Canadian Encyclopedia. Available at: http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/. Retrieved: 2013/01/31.
PWC (2016), “Aerospace & defense 2015 year in review and 2016 forecast”, Report, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Available online: http://clearwaterinternational.com/, Access: 2016-07-23.
ROHRBECK R., HÖLZE K., GEMÜNDEN H.G. (2009), “Opening up for competitive advantage - how Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem”, R&D Management, vol. 39, n. 4, pp. 420-430.
SICELOFF S. (2010), “Emerging technologies may fuel revolutionary launcher”, North-American Space Agency (NASA), Available online: http://www.nasa.gov/. Access: 2014-02-15.
VAN DE VRANDE V., DE JONG J.P.J., VANHAVERBEKE W., ROCHEMONT M. (2009), “Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges”, Technovation, vol. 29, n. 6-7, pp. 423-37.
VANHAVERBEKE W. (2006), “The interorganizational context of open innovation”, in Chesbrough H.W., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (eds.), Open innovation: researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press, Ch.10, pp. 205-19.
VEUGELERS M., BURY J., VIAENE S. (2010), “Linking technology intelligence to open innovation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 77, n. 2, pp. 335-43.
WEST J., BOGERS M. (2013), “Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, n. 4, pp. 814-831.
WEST J., GALLAGHER S. (2006), “Patterns of open Innovation in open source software”, in Chesbrough H.W., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Ch.5, pp. 82-106.
