How do firms interpret extended responsibilities for a sustainable supply chain management of innovative technologies? An analysis of corporate sustainability reports in the energy sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7433/s109.2019.04Keywords:
end-of-life; extended responsibility; supply chain management; sustainability reportAbstract
Purpose of the paper: This paper aims to analyze how companies fulfill their responsibility in shaping sustainable supply chain strategies for innovative technologies. To this end, it describes a decade of evolution of Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) end-of-life management practices among leading energy utilities.
Methodology: Using GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database, a content analysis of 172 corporate sustainability reports of 16 European energy utilities was conducted.
Results: The content analysis provides a clear idea of the actual commitment to foster LIBs end-of-life management by highlighting that energy utilities are still far from taking lead responsibilities on this emerging -yet potentially critical- issue. Apart from minor initiatives, LIBs are crucial for building short-term business strategies that, however, overlook their relevance for the implementation of the extended producer responsibility principle.
Research limits: The main limitations are the use of publicly accessible web sites and corporate sustainability reports, which are concise and secondary data sources, and the lack of comparison of energy utilities with sustainability leaders from other industries.
Practical implications: The study helps managers to more fully comprehend environmental issues associated with emerging and soon to be widespread products and, thus, to better focus on the opportunities and problems of end-of-life management for innovative technologies.
Originality of the paper: The study is unique in its purpose to complement publicly accessible information from the Internet with sustainability reports to provide a systemic view on how crucial actors within the supply chain of innovative technologies implement specific environmental practices that might affect the future of these technologies.
References
BESKE P., SEURING S. (2014), “Putting sustainability into supply chain management”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 19, n. 3, pp. 322-331.
CARTER C.R., ROGERS D.S. (2008), “A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 38, n. 5, pp. 360-387.
CICCULLO F., PERO M., CARIDI M., GOSLING J., PURVIS L. (2018). “Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp. 2336-2350.
COMAS MARTI’ J.M.C., SEIFERT R. (2013), “Assessing the Comprehensiveness of Supply Chain Environmental Strategies”, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 22, n. 5, pp. 339-356.
DEFEE C.C., ESPER T., MOLLENKOPF D. (2009), “Leveraging closed-loop orientation and leadership for environmental sustainability”, Supply Chain Management, vol. 14, n. 2, pp. 87-98.
FORMENTINI M., TATICCHI P. (2016), “Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, pp. 1920-1933.
GRAHAM S. (2018), “Antecedent to environmental supply chain strategies: The role of internal integration and environmental learning”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 197, pp. 283-296.
GUPTA S., PALSULE-DESAI O.D. (2011), “Sustainable supply chain management: review and research opportunities”, IIMB Management Review, vol. 23, n. 4, pp. 234-245.
HALLDORSSON A., KOTZAB H., SKJOTT-LARSEN T. (2009), “Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse?”, Logistics Research, vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 83-94.
HICKLE G. (2017), “Extending the Boundaries: An Assessment of the Integration of Extended Producer Responsibility Within Corporate Social Responsibility”, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 112-124.
HSIEH H.F., SHANNON S.E. (2005), “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis”, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, n. 9, pp. 1277-1288.
LEBEDEVA N., DI PERSIO F., BOON-BRETT L. (2017), “Lithium Ion Battery Value Chain and Related Opportunities for Europe”, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/lithium-ion-battery-valuechain-and-related-opportunities-europe.
MAYYAS A., STEWARD D., MANN M. (2019). “The case of recycling: Overview and challenges in the material supply for automotive li-ion batteries”, Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 19, e00087.
MECKENSTOCK J., BARBOSA-POVOA A.P., CARVALHO A. (2016), “The wicked character of sustainable supply chain management: Evidence from sustainability reports”, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 25, n. 7, pp. 449-477.
MIEMCZYK J., HOWARD M., JOHNSEN T.E. (2016), “Dynamic development and execution of closed-loop supply chains: a natural resource-based view”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 21, n. 4, pp. 453-469.
MILES M.B., HUBERMAN A.M. (1994), Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.), Sage, London.
NEUTZLING D.M., LAND A., SEURING S., MACHADO DO NASCIMENTO L.F. (2018), “Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp. 3448-3458.
PAGELL M., WU Z., MURTHY N.N. (2007), “The supply chain implications of recycling”, Business Horizons, vol. 50, n. 2, pp. 133-143.
PRATER E., BIEHL M., SMITH M.A. (2001). “International supply chain agility-Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 21, n. 5/6, pp. 823-839.
RIZZI F., FREY M., TESTA F., APPOLLONI A. (2014), “Environmental value chain in green SME networks: the threat of the Abilene paradox”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 85, pp. 265-275.
SCIENCE FOR ENVIRONMENT POLICY, (2018), “Towards the battery of the future. Future Brief 20”, Brief produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
STEWART R., NIERO M. (2018), “Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector”, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 27, n. 7, pp. 1005-1022.
STRATISTICS MARKEY RESEARCH CONSULTING (2018), Lithium-ion Battery - Global Market Outlook (2017-2026), pp. 136.
TATE W.L., ELLRAM L.M., KIRCHOFF J.F. (2010), “Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 46, n. 1, pp. 19-44.
THOMAS D.R. (2006). “A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data”, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, n. 2, pp. 237-246.
TOFFEL M.W. (2003), “The growing strategic importance of end-of-life product management”, California Management Review, vol. 45, n. 3, pp. 102-129.
TUTORE I., FERRETTI M., SIMONI M. (2014), “Overcoming the barriers to the innovations diffusion through diffusion-oriented policies. The case of Li-Ion Battery for Electric Vehicles”, Sinergie, n. 94, pp. 115-135.
VACHON S., KLASSEN R.D. (2006), “Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 26, n. 7, pp. 795-821.
VAN BOMMEL H. (2011), “A conceptual framework for analyzing sustainability strategies in industrial supply networks from an innovation perspective”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, n. 8, pp. 895-904.
WIJK J.V., PERSOON W. (2006), “A long-haul destination: sustainability reporting among tour operators”, European Management Journal, vol. 24, n. 6, pp. 381-395.
ZHU Q., SARKIS J., LAI K. (2012), “Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediators in performance improvements”, International Journal of Production, vol. 50, n. 5, pp. 1377-1394.
