Lavoro istituzionale e trasformazione della gestione di un sito UNESCO (Institutional work and management transformation of an UNESCO site)
il patrimonio culturale tra processi di pianificazione e di cambiamento organizzativo (cultural heritage between planning processes and organizational change)
Purpose of the paper: This work discusses the introduction of planning and management tools in the case of cultural heritage. The discussion follows an organizational and institutional change perspective.
Methodology: A longitudinal case study has been carried out according to an ethnographic approach, based on three years of field work.
Findings: Planning and management tools have been repeatedly invoked for the historical and archaeological site of Aquileia, where they have been partially introduced and without fail left in disuse within a process of continuous organizational reconfiguration. Such process has been characterized by a general lack of management in the institutional context. Within the institutional work perspective this phenomenon is related to the interaction between practices which “activate and support” boundaries and boundaries which “limit” the set of practices, offering in return interesting dynamics on institutionalization processes of the logics of conservation and enhancement of cultural heritage
Research limits: The article focused on institutional change in relation to variations in the content of organizational practices. It does not deal with the legitimation of new organizational forms and the emergence of institutions as network for the conservation and enhancement of cultural heritage nor with the critical analysis of the social construction and use of planning and management tools
Practical implications: Gaining a better understanding of the characteristics and the role of accounting tools allows us to provide better guidance for their introduction within cultural heritage management. It also enables us to improve their use in organizational contexts which need to manage their own institutional and organizational change.
Originality of the paper: The phenomenon under investigation has been examined under a critical management lens. This is particularly interesting in light of the unsuccessful outcomes which have emerged in relation to the specific aspects taken into consideration by this study
AGAR M. (1996), The Professional Stranger. An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, Elsevier, London.
AHRENS T., CHAPMAN C.S. (2007), “Management accounting as practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 32, n. 1-2, pp. 1-27.
ALVESSON M., BRIDGMAN T., WILMOTT H. (a cura di) (2009), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
BARNES B. (2001), “Practice as collective action”, in Schatzki T.R., Knorr Cetina K., Von Savigny E., The practice turn in contemporary theory, Routledge, Abingdon (UK).
BATTILANA J., LECA B., BOXENBAUM E. (2009), “How Actors Change Institutions”, Academy of Management Annals, vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 65-107.
BONINI BARALDI S. (2007), Management, beni culturali e pubblica amministrazione, Franco Angeli, Milano.
CHAPMAN C.S., COOPER D.J., MILLER P.B. (a cura di) (2012), Accounting, Organizations, and Institutions, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
CZARNIAWSKA B. (1997), Narrating the Organization, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
CZARNIAWSKA B. (2009), “Emerging Institutions: Pyramids or Anthills”, Organization Studies, vol. 30, n. 4, pp. 423-441.
DACIN M.T., MUNIR K., TRACEY P. (2010), “Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 53, pp. 1393-1418.
DIMAGGIO P.J., POWELL W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, vol. 48, n. 2, pp. 147-160.
FELDMAN M.S., ORLIKOWSKI W.J. (2011), “Theorizing practice and practicing theory”, Organization Science, vol. 22, n. 5, pp. 1240-1253.
GARFINKEL H. (1967), Studies in ethnomethodology, Prentince Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
GREENWOOD R., OLIVER C., SAHLIN K., SUDDABY R. (a cura di) (2008), The SAGE Handbook of organizational institutionalism, Sage, London.
GREENWOOD R., HININGS C.R., WHETTEN D. (2014), “Rethinking Institutions and Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 51, n. 7, pp. 1206-1220.
JAY J. (2013), “Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 56, n. 1, pp. 137-159.
LAWRENCE T.B., SUDDABY R. (2006), “Institutions and institutional work”, in Clegg S.R., Hardy C., Lawrence T.B., Nord W.R. (a cura di), Handbook of organisation studies, Sage, London.
LAWRENCE T.B., SUDDABY R., LECA B. (a cura di) (2009), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization, Cambridge Universiy Press, Cambridge.
LOK J., DE ROND M. (2013), “On the Plasticity of Institutions: Containing and Restoring Practice Breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 56, n. 1, pp. 185-207.
MARCUS G.E., FISCHER M.M.J. (1999), Anthropology as Cultural Critique. An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, 2^ Ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
MASTROBERARDINO P., NIGRO C., CALABRESE G., PETRACCA M. (2013), “Il processo innovativo nella prospettiva situazionista”, Atti XXV Convegno Sinergie, L’innovazione per la competitività dell’impresa, 24-25 Ottobre, Ancona.
MEYER J.W., ROWAN B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, n. 2, pp. 340-363.
MILLER P., POWER M. (2013), “Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory”, The Academy of Management Annals, vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 557-605.
NICOLINI D. (2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
NIGRO C., IANNUZZI E., CAROLILLO G. (2012), “Comunicazione e strutturazione di un quadro istituzionale. Riflessioni sulla recente crisi del sistema finanziario”, Sinergie, n. 89, Settembre-Dicembre.
POWELL W.W., DIMAGGIO P. (1991), The new institutionalism in organization analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
POWELL W.W., COLYVAS J.A. (2008), “Microfoundations of Institutional Theory”, in Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R. (a cura di), The SAGE Handbook of organizational institutionalism, Sage, London.
SCHATZKI T.R., KNORR CETINA K., VON SAVIGNY E. (a cura di) (2001), The practice turn in contemporary theory, Routledge, Abingdon.
SCHATZKI T.R. (2002), The site of the social: A philosophical exploration of the consitution of social life and change, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
SCHATZKI T.R. (2005), “The Site of Organizations”, Organization Studies, vol. 26, n. 3, pp. 465-484.
SCOTT W.R. (2001), Institutions and organizations, 2^ Ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks.
SEO M-G., CREED W.E.D. (2002), “Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 27, n. 2, pp. 222-247.
SETTIS S. (2010), Paesaggio, Costituzione, Cemento, Einaudi, Torino.
SETTIS S. (2012), “Perché gli italiani sono diventati nemici dell’arte”, Il Giornale dell’Arte, n. 324, Ottobre, pp. 22-23.
SMETS M., MORRIS T., GREENWOOD R. (2012), “From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Drivern Institutional Change”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 55, n. 4, pp. 877-904.
SWIDLER A. (1986), “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies”, American Sociological Review, vol. 51, n. 2, pp. 273-286.
SWIDLER A. (2001), “What anchors cultural practices”, in Schatzki T.R., Knorr Cetina K., Von Savigny E., The practice turn in contemporary theory, Routledge, Abingdon (UK).
TRACEY P., PHILLIPS N., JARVIS O. (2011), “Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model”, Organization Science, vol. 22, n. 1, pp. 60-80.
THORNTON P.H., JONES C., KURY K. (2005), “Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing”, Research in the Sociology of Organizations - Transformation in Cultural Industries, vol. 23, pp. 125-170.
THORNTON P.H., OCASIO W., LOUNSBURY M. (2012), The Institutional Logics Perspective. A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
VAN MAANEN J. (1988), Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
ZAN L. (2003), Economia dei musei e retorica del management, Il Mulino, Bologna.
ZAN L. (a cura di) (2014), La gestione del patrimonio culturale. Una prospettiva internazionale, Il Mulino, Bologna.
ZIETSMA C., LAWRENCE T.B. (2010), “Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 55, June, pp. 189-221.